How easy to read is Jane Austen?

Sparkling with wit, Jane Austen’s graceful style is even more reader-friendly than the language of newspapers.

So are the first chapters of literary classics like David Copperfield and Sons and Lovers. They are all easier to read than newspapers.

That’s what I found in a readability test that looked at the number of words in a sentence and whether the words were long or short.

Continue reading “How easy to read is Jane Austen?”

A Truth Universally Acknowledged: About Jane Austen

Janeites will love A Truth Universally Acknowledged, a collection of essays by 33 famous writers and critics acknowledging the genius of Jane Austen.

Her admirers will have the pleasure of discovering their feelings shared by writers like Virginia Woolf, EM Forster, Somerset Maugham, CS Lewis, JB Priestley, Kingsley Amis, Martin Amis, David Lodge and critics like Lionel Trilling and Harold Bloom. Kudos to the editor, Susannah Carson, who brought them together in this book.

Martin Amis

Martin Amis speaks for us all when he tries to pin down the appeal of Pride and Prejudice:

For example, why does the reader yearn with such helpless fervour for the marriage of Elizabeth Bennet and Mr Darcy?

Elizabeth, of course, is very attractive. To quote Amis,

Elizabeth Bennet is Jane Austen with added spirit, with subversive passion, and, above all else, with looks.

Continue reading “A Truth Universally Acknowledged: About Jane Austen”

Jane Austen: Contemporary as you please

Sunday Times exaggerates when it says: “Jane Austen is not just a novelist but a cultural ideal. Her books teach us what it means to be civilised.” The elaborate courtesies and leisurely lives of her characters today have all the charm of a period drama.

But Jane Austen (16 December 1775 – 18 July 1817) is surprisingly modern in other ways. In her language, for instance. Take, for example, the famous opening words of Pride and Prejudice:

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife.

It’s modern English.

Pride and Prejudice is contemporary too in the manner it opens. The characters start speaking as soon as the story begins, as they might in a play. That’s not how most novels began in those days: the author would usually describe the people and places first. That’s how Jane Austen herself  began her novels, Emma, Mansfield Park and Northanger Abbey, by describing the circumstances of her heroines. But in Pride and Prejudice, she lets the characters speak for themselves, weaving in the background as they talk.

Jane Austen is contemporary in her preoccupations too. Parents still try to provide for their children, money and status are as important today as they were in her time, and there will always be lovers.

Her characters are closer to us than Shakespeare’s. Her heroines don’t crossdress like Shakespeare’s romantic heroines. Her heroes don’t physically confront their enemies like Macbeth or Hamlet. Money is used to hush up scandals. Her characters want to keep up appearances and be respectable.

VS Naipaul said Jane Austen would have never become world-famous had there been no British empire. The same may be said of other British writers, too. And her appeal has outlasted the empire: her novels continue to be made into movies and television dramas – proof of her enduring popularity.

I love Pride and Prejudice but haven’t seen it on film or television. So here is Sense and Sensibility, which I did see, with Emma Thompson and Hugh Grant in the leading roles. Look at her bursting into tears when she learns he is not married after all and wants her for his wife. That’s another nice thing about Jane Austen – she doesn’t disappoint her lovers.

The scene here is based on the penultimate chapter of the novel, which can be read here. And here is the opening of Pride and Prejudice, which, since it’s a favourite of mine, also follows here:

Continue reading “Jane Austen: Contemporary as you please”